"No matter how good the research was, if it is unpublished, it is incomplete," said Professor Jose Florencio Lapeña, Jr, Editor-in-Chief of the Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and President of the Philippine Association of Medical Journal Editors (PAMJE) during the National Medical Writing and Review Workshop conducted at Marriott Hotel in Cebu City on 19-20 January 2012.

One of the reasons why scientific journal publishing is weak in the country is the quality of articles being submitted for publication. "The quality of articles being written does not meet the editorial standards of medical journals," said Dr. Lapeña. "This is the reason why we want to hold this workshop. We want to help and guide health researchers to write scientific articles for medical journals."

The workshop taught the participants the basics of writing scientific articles, its principles and guidelines, effective presentation of statistical results, tabulations and illustrations. Resource speakers discussed the editorial workflow, peer review processes, the roles and responsibilities of editors and reviewers, plagiarisms and ethical guidelines in scientific writing and reporting.

In his presentation, Professor Lapeña stressed the advantages of writing for medical journals. He said that aside from career, professional and institutional gains, writing for journals will contribute knowledge to medical discipline and provide opportunity for information sharing leading to wider utilization and application of research results.

He added that "doing research is important, but writing what, why and how it was done, is even more important because it serves as permanent documentation of scientific works and preserves the legacy of researchers' accomplishments."

Meanwhile, Dr. Wilfred Peh, Clinical Professor at the National University of Singapore and President of the Singapore Association of Medical Journal Editors (SAMJE) discussed the different structures of scientific papers, authorship and contributorship, and the tools that can help medical journals to effectively and efficiently screen quality articles for publication.

Dr. Peh emphasized the important role of reviewers in the scientific process and publication system. Reviewers who are usually doctors or scientists working in the same area of interest are responsible in safeguarding the quality and credibility of results of the study. "They aid as gatekeepers that will determine whether the manuscript will be published or rejected," said Dr. Peh.

Dr. Cecilia Maramba - Lazarte, Pediatrician and Pharmacology Professor at the University of the Philippines Manila and Editor-in-chief of Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society of the Philippines Journal (PIDSPJ) tackled the criteria of case reports for medical journal publications.

"Publishable patient case report should describe rare, perplexing new diseases, new method of diagnosis, unexpected association between diseases and symptoms, new side effects and complications as well as new strategies or improved treatment that will spawn new research and provide information that strays from classical textbook cases," she said.

The National Medical Writing and Review Workshop was organized by the Philippine Council for Health Research and Development (PCHRD) in collaboration with Philippine Association of Medical Journal Editors (PAMJE) and Asia Pacific Association of Medical Journal Editors (APAME).

Stakeholders in health and health-related systems in the country gathers today in Bacolod City, for the 5th Philippine National Health Research Systems (PNHRS) Week Conference with the theme "Convergence in Divergence, Innovations for Better Health." There will be discussions on research utilization and health research. Highlights of the conference include the launching of the Health Innovation Marketplace and the awarding of winners for the Best Mentor and Poster Exhibit.

1st Student Research Competition in Health Science and Technology
(Pre Conference)

There are twelve (12) entries that qualify for the 1st Student Research Competition in Health Science and Technology:

  1. Drug-Drug Interaction of Monolaurin and Oxacillin Against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25293  (Tarlac State University)
  2. Cytotoxic activity of crude flavonoid extract from Molave (Vitex parviflora) leaves against human prostate cancer (PC-3) cells in vitro (Angeles University Foundation)
  3. In Vitro Determination of the Anti-Mitotic Activity of Gracilaria Salicornia(Marine Red Algae) on Tripneusters gratilla (sea urchin) embryos using Vincristin-e Sulfate as Control (Cebu Institute of Medicine)
  4. Effect of Taro (Clocasia Esculenta) on the growth of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Sensory Quality of Yogurt (Visayas State University)
  5. The Potential of Straberry Leaf Extract as an Alternative Wound Healing Agent (Benguet State University)
  6. Development and Evaluation of Eye Screeining Tool among Grade 1 Students of Public Elementary Schools in Zamboanga City (Ateneo de Zamboanga City)
  7. Growth Response of Marcotted Pittosporum resineferum (Petroleum Nut Tree) Treated with Root Hormones (Western Mindanao State University)
  8. Effectiveness of End-Range Mobilization Versus Mobilization with Movement among Patients with Adhesive Capsulitis - A quasi Experimental Study (De La Salle University)
  9. Level of Hope and Quality of Life of Prisoners in New Bilibid Prison, Muntilupa City (De La Salle University)
  10. Inhibitory Effect of Alagaw (Premna Odorata) Bark Aqueous and Ethanol Extracts Against Escherichia Coli in-Vitro (Benguet State University)
  11. Barries to Therapeutic Regimen Adherence of Type II Diabetes Mellitus in Iligan City (Mindanao State University)
  12. Extent of Paternal Care Towards Postpartum Mothers and their Neonates (University of St. La Salle - Bacolod)

In general, the questions are more on the objectives of the research, methodologies, and analysis of data specifically the use of statistical tools. For studies that involve human participants, research ethics is put into consideration.

Synthesis (Pre Conference)

Dr. Acuin gave the participants a very brief background of the PNHRS, this being the 5th PNHRS conference and is headed by the Department of Science and Technology, Department of Health, Commission on Higher Education and the University of the Philippines, Manila.

Including the Next Steps, Dr. Acuin then flashed the four (4) questions that shall serve as discussion guides for the FGD, namely:

What are your RU goals?

What has your consortium accomplished in RU?

What are the RU needs of your consortium?

How can you work with PNHRS core agencies to help you meet your RU goals?

Everyone was given meta cards and markers to write their responses and it was suggested by Dr. Palaganas that everyone answer all questions instead of focusing on each one and moving to the other.

After everyone had posted their responses to all the questions Dr. Acuin grouped all the common responses. As a result the following were derived:

  1. What are your RU goals?
  • More people to be informed of our output
  • Have research output reach stakeholders
  • Have research output utilized by stakeholders
  • Promote best practice among health providers
  • Research = a tool for equity in health
  • Research output translated to policy and utilized to improve health system
  • Establish monitoring and information system
  • Establish data base for the consortium
  • Utilize ICT to support universal health care.
  • Foster/ strengthen collaboration among consortium members
  1. What has your consortium accomplished in RU?
  • Website, radio, conference, flyers/brochures (Region I)
  • Conduct of monthly for a Research "Kapihan" (CAR)
  • Dissemination of outputs thru conferences, HERDIN, NeON training and publication (Region XI)
  • Quarterly RTD Acta Medica: National Health Journal (NCR)
  • Information system for maternal health (Region 2)
  • Question and answer for/ in medical domain (NCR)
  • ICT for medical imaging (results interpretation and diagnosis) (NCR)
  • ICT support for patient care (NCR)
  • Members of consortium: Peer review (research articles for publication) (Region 2)
  • Training on "Writing for Publications" (Focus: Publication as a form of RU strategy) (CAR)
  • Training/expertise sharing
  • Members of consortium: invited to critique research presentations in member-agencies of the consortium (CAR)
  • Not so successful (no utilization) (Region 6)
  • Stakeholders don't seem to get the message (Region 6)

Dr. Jaime Manila of Western Visayas Health Research and Development Consortium (WVHRDC) clarified that Region 6 has done so much in the field of research but the outcome has not been utilized. The conversation revolved around the issue of making the stakeholders see that these researches can be translated into policies - knowledge translation.

Other HRD such as CAR have done roundtable discussions that involve policymakers, NGOs, consumers, and special publics to as to maximize RU.

  1.  What are the RU needs of your consortium?
  • For the website: honorarium/wage for the developer/uploader (Region 1)
  • Late release of budget to finance programs of Region 1 HDC
  • Continuously and timely release of financial support (Region 11)
  • Human resource
  • Radio: funds to support its operation; present/ develop high quality flyer
  • A more supportive national government
  • More "laymanization" of health research to make it more relevant stakeholders (NCR)
  • Full utilization of the website to disseminate research findings
  • Data expertise, user requirements (NCR)
  • No involvement of most medical doctors in Region 1
  • More concrete (operationalized support) by members of consortium of RU
  • Better coordination /communication (MMHRD is too big)
  • Reasons to work together (projects and initiative)
  • A strong, functional RU committee
  • Establish more mechanisms for RU
  • Access to data
  • Ethics policy
  1. How can you work with PNHRS core agencies to help you meet your RU goals?
  • Improve networking between regions and institutions to enhance dissemination of output
  • Research collaboration and coordination
  • More efficient coordinating mechanisms
  • Tap all health and health-related institutions in Region 1
  • Website of all member consortia
  • Collaborative researches than individual researches (CAR)
  • Consultants: technical writing, publications (Region XI)
  • Better cohesion at national level so it can influence regions (Region 1)
  • Coordinate with DOH
  • DOH to help make policies re: research output (Region 6)

 Next Steps

  • More aligned financial management of the consortia and institutional incentives
  • Coordination of core agencies at the regional level
  • On-line convening of the consortia to share best practices
  • "Checklist"of financial releases
  • More collaborative researches

Page 3 of 6